Why HubSpot is More Than a CRM
When I first started using HubSpot, I treated it like a glorified email tool with a CRM bolted on. Honestly, I wasn’t sure if it would replace the patchwork of platforms my team was already juggling—Mailchimp for emails, Google Sheets for lead tracking, Slack for internal communication, and a half-built dashboard in Data Studio that no one really used. But like a lot of marketers trying to scale while keeping costs sane, I kept hearing the same phrase from peers: “We just moved to HubSpot. It’s been a game-changer.”
Fast forward a few years and countless implementations later—from solo consultants to $50M brands—I’ve learned how to make HubSpot do more than just centralize data. I’ve used it to run full-funnel strategies, sync remote teams, unlock real ROI from content, and build a true shared system of truth between marketing and sales. And with the evolution of AI baked into the platform, HubSpot is no longer just a smart CRM—it’s becoming the operating system of modern marketing.
This article is meant to walk you through how I make HubSpot actually work—not the fluff you get in onboarding videos, but the stuff you figure out the hard way. We’ll look at:
- How to build a smart, scalable HubSpot setup from the start
- Where HubSpot’s AI features shine (and where they flop)
- How to automate workflows without losing your human edge
- What integrations are worth it (and how to keep data clean)
- Real-world use cases from teams I’ve led or trained
If you’re a marketing manager trying to get more from your tech stack—or just trying to get your team to stop fighting the tool they’re supposed to be using—this guide is for you.
Let’s dive in and turn HubSpot into your team’s unfair advantage.
Laying the Foundation: Smart Setup That Scales
If you’ve ever walked into a HubSpot portal that’s been Frankensteined together over the years—random lifecycle stages, 200 unassigned contacts, and automations labeled “test2-revised-final”—you’ll know why I’m a stickler for setup.
In my experience, the biggest difference between teams that thrive with HubSpot and those that constantly grumble about it boils down to one thing: how well they set up the basics. The beauty of HubSpot is that it can scale from scrappy startup to multi-division enterprise. But only if the foundation is tight.
Here’s how I approach setup when I’m starting fresh—or untangling someone else’s mess:
Define Your Objects and Map Your Funnel
Before clicking anything, I sit down and literally sketch the buyer journey. I’m not talking about fancy customer journey maps—I mean a practical, operational view: Where do leads come from? Who works them? When does marketing hand off to sales? Where do deals break down?
Once I understand that, I customize the default objects (contacts, companies, deals) and set up custom properties that matter. For example:
- Lead Source Detail – Not just “Organic,” but “Google Business Profile” or “Top 10 Blog Post.”
- Lifecycle Nuance – I often add intermediate stages between MQL and SQL, depending on the team’s structure.
- Deal Segments – If you sell multiple services or products, segment them right here with pipelines or tags.
You want your data model to reflect how your team actually works—not the other way around.
Set Up Contact Management Rules Early
One of the easiest ways to tank your HubSpot adoption is to let contacts pile up with no owner or next step. Every team I’ve worked with that succeeds on HubSpot has a clear protocol for contact ownership, lifecycle progression, and task automation.
I typically implement the following from day one:
- Ownership assignment based on rules (round-robin, territory, lead source)
- Lead rotation workflows with fallback logic
- Lifecycle auto-updates based on activity (downloads, calls, meetings)
- Dead lead tracking with sunset rules
It’s not sexy work. But it’s what makes the rest of the platform usable at scale.
Standardize Naming and Folder Structures
You don’t need to go full Marie Kondo, but future-you (and your team) will thank you for being organized:
- Campaign naming conventions (e.g., “2025-Q3-Launch-Webinar”)
- Workflow folders by funnel stage
- Email and template folders by campaign type
- Form naming that reflects entry point (e.g., “Whitepaper – Retargeting – B2B”)
This is the kind of stuff that seems minor until your fifth campaign, when someone duplicates the wrong nurture flow and sends a webinar invite to the entire database. (Yes, it happened.)
Mini Case Study: Cleaning Up a Frankenstein Setup
One midsize SaaS client brought me in after their CMO nearly pulled the plug on HubSpot. Sales hated it. Marketing had no visibility. Leads were being ignored. After auditing their portal, we found three separate lead scoring models, zero automation for task creation, and hundreds of contacts that hadn’t been touched in 90 days.
Within four weeks, we redefined their lifecycle model, rebuilt lead routing with logic based on industry and intent, and created a shared dashboard showing funnel performance. Suddenly, the sales team saw value again. And leadership started trusting the data.
Leveraging AI Inside HubSpot: What’s Real, What’s Hype
When HubSpot first rolled out its AI tools, I’ll admit—I was skeptical. I’ve lived through a lot of marketing tech hype cycles: the automation gold rush of the 2010s, the chatbot craze, “big data” dashboards that promised insights and delivered heatmaps no one read. So when I saw buttons labeled “generate with AI,” my guard was up.
But over the past year, I’ve found that HubSpot’s AI is quietly becoming one of the most practical time-savers in the stack—if you use it with intention.
Let me walk you through where AI inside HubSpot has actually made a difference for my teams—and where it’s still not ready for prime time.
AI-Powered Content Generation: Helpful, But Not Hands-Off
Let’s start with the Content Assistant—HubSpot’s version of a built-in writing AI. I’ve used this inside the blog tool, landing pages, and marketing emails. If you’re expecting it to write conversion-ready copy that matches your tone and brand… yeah, no. It still sounds like a robot with a marketing degree.
But where it shines is as a fast draft partner. Need five subject line variations in a pinch? Boom. Want a headline rephrased in a more casual tone? Done. When used like a brainstorming intern—fast, tireless, decent with a prompt—it can absolutely save hours.
Real-world use:
One of my clients, a mid-sized e-comm brand, started using the AI assistant to help their lean marketing team churn out weekly product launch emails. A marketer would write a rough brief in bullet points, then ask HubSpot’s AI to draft the first pass. Editing took 10–15 minutes instead of writing from scratch. Result: we doubled their email cadence with no drop in open rates—and no extra hires.
AI for SEO: A Quiet Win
Here’s one that surprised me—HubSpot’s AI content tools inside the blog editor actually helped junior team members write SEO-optimized posts that ranked. By guiding them with suggestions around structure, headings, and topic relevance (especially when paired with the SEO recommendations tool), it took a lot of guesswork out of the equation.
We used this to train a content intern to produce usable, rankable drafts in their first month. With just a little human finesse, we had a blog post on “Medicare lead generation strategies” climbing to page one in less than six weeks.
Caveat: You still need a content strategy. HubSpot’s AI won’t tell you what to write to match business goals—but it will help write it faster, cleaner, and more aligned to search best practices.
AI in Reporting: Useful, but Limited
There’s a newer feature called AI-generated reports that lets you ask questions like “Which channel brought the most MQLs in Q1?” and get a quick, visual answer. Cool in theory.
In practice? It works for top-level stuff. But when I really want insight—conversion lag, attribution holes, multi-touch journey questions—I still build my own reports manually. AI isn’t a replacement for strategy. Yet.
My advice: Use AI-generated reports for client meetings or exec summaries. They’re great for those “Just show me the top 5 sources” moments. But don’t let them replace the deep-dive work that drives actual optimization.
Conversational AI and Chatbots: Better, But Needs Guardrails
HubSpot’s chatbot builder now comes with an AI option that generates flows for you based on intent. It’s slick—but left unchecked, it can still lead to a clunky user experience.
We used this with a B2B SaaS brand to generate chatbot flows for demo scheduling and resource recommendations. It helped us launch faster, but we still had to review and tweak logic to avoid dead ends or off-brand phrasing. Think of it like scaffolding: great for speed, not so great if you forget to build the structure underneath.
Mini Case Study: Reducing Campaign Production Time by 40%
At a wellness company I worked with, the in-house team was drowning in demand for weekly campaigns. They’d fallen into a “launch it last minute” cycle, often missing deadlines. We introduced HubSpot’s AI email and content tools with a process: the team created a brief, AI drafted assets, and human editors polished. Within two months, they were hitting 100% of deadlines, had a 40% faster content production cycle, and even carved out time to test new offers.
Automation That Works Like a Teammate, Not a Tangle
There’s a moment in every HubSpot rollout where someone says, “We should just automate that.” And they’re right—until three months later when no one can explain why one lead got 9 emails, another got none, and Sales is furious because tasks are firing at 2am.
HubSpot’s automation tools are powerful. But powerful doesn’t mean complex. The best automation feels invisible. It removes friction without removing control.
Here’s how I approach automation that actually helps your team instead of overwhelming them:
Start With Repetitive Pain, Not Features
I never begin with “Let’s build a lead scoring model” or “Let’s automate the lifecycle.” That’s cart-before-horse thinking.
Instead, I sit with teams and ask:
“What are you doing over and over again that slows you down or lets leads fall through the cracks?”
From there, we build small automations that solve actual problems:
- Auto-assigning tasks when a demo is booked
- Triggering nurture email #1 only after a call is logged
- Creating Slack alerts when a lead goes from cold to hot overnight
Automation should feel like you just hired a super-organized assistant, not like you joined a Black Mirror episode.
Use Workflows to Bridge Gaps Between Teams
Marketing → Sales → Success handoffs are where most companies lose momentum.
I’ve seen wins just by inserting the right workflows here:
- After an SQL is marked “Closed Won”, automatically trigger a success team notification, kickoff checklist, and personalized welcome email.
- If a deal stalls, route it back to marketing for a re-engagement nurture with adjusted messaging.
- When usage drops (via integration), push a proactive check-in task to the account manager.
You can build this gradually. What matters is that every automation closes a loop that would otherwise break in a spreadsheet or inbox.
Avoid the “Too Many Workflows” Trap
I once inherited a portal with 173 active workflows. No naming conventions. No ownership. No idea what half of them did.
So here’s the rule I live by:
Every automation should have a single owner, a clear outcome, and a sunset date for review.
I build in quarterly audits, and I tag all workflows by funnel stage and purpose. And when someone wants to launch “just one quick fix,” I ask: Will this conflict with anything else firing at the same time?
Simplicity wins.
Real-World Win: From Chaos to Clarity in 6 Weeks
For a healthcare lead gen client, we trimmed 42 outdated workflows down to 9 streamlined ones. The result?
- Lead follow-up time dropped by 73%
- Sales meetings doubled
- And best of all: the team trusted the system again
The VP told me, “It finally feels like HubSpot is working for us, not the other way around.”
Reporting That Actually Moves the Revenue Needle
If you’ve ever opened a HubSpot dashboard and squinted at a sea of bar graphs without knowing what to do next… you’re not alone.
HubSpot’s reporting tools are solid—but only if you treat them as answers to questions your team is already asking, not just boxes to tick for the board deck.
Reporting That Aligns the Whole Funnel
Most companies track some things well—usually vanity stuff like email open rates or web sessions. But what we really want is clarity across the full revenue path.
Here’s the real win: one source of truth where marketing, sales, and success all see how they’re contributing to pipeline and growth.
To get there, I ask:
- What’s the exact moment a lead becomes valuable to Sales?
- Where are we consistently losing deals, and why?
- Which channels drive not just MQLs—but revenue?
- What’s our customer acquisition cost by persona?
Then I reverse-engineer dashboards and attribution models to answer only those questions.
From MQL to Revenue Attribution (Without Tears)
Here’s what I’ve learned: marketing and sales alignment doesn’t come from another meeting. It comes from shared metrics.
I build dashboards that both teams can own:
- Conversion rates by funnel stage
- Lead source → SQL → Closed-Won journey
- Time-to-close by persona or industry
- Velocity and value by lead owner
This ends finger-pointing. Now, Marketing sees that Facebook campaigns drive SQLs that close in 22 days. Sales sees that B2B leads from paid search take longer but close higher.
And best of all—everyone has real data to improve their own part of the funnel.
Set It and Review It (Don’t Forget the “Ops” in RevOps)
Dashboards are not wallpaper.
I create cadence-based reporting rituals: weekly snapshot, monthly trend, and quarterly strategic insight reviews.
For example:
- A weekly “red flag” Slack digest showing drop-offs in demo-to-close rate
- A monthly exec dashboard that pairs top-line revenue data with funnel insights
- A quarterly deep dive into CAC trends and emerging high-LTV sources
It’s not about more reporting. It’s about reporting that triggers action.
Real-World Win: The 20-Minute Dashboard That Saved a Quarter
One client came to me mid-quarter: pipeline was flat, CAC rising, exec team breathing down their neck.
We pulled a “top leads by source + sales velocity” report in HubSpot. Within 20 minutes, we spotted that paid search leads were routing to a junior SDR with a two-week backlog—while organic leads were closing fast.
Quick fix: reassign hot leads based on velocity.
Result: closed $412K in deals that would’ve otherwise aged out.
That’s the kind of insight reporting should unlock. Not just dashboards—decisions.
Nurture Sequences, Email Strategy, and CRM Hygiene That Doesn’t Rot
At some point, every marketing team realizes their email automation isn’t working.
Open rates flatline. Nurture sequences feel like shouting into the void. Sales says leads are cold, even though “they downloaded the ebook.”
Here’s the truth: it’s not the content—it’s the strategy and the hygiene.
The “Lifecycle Overload” Problem
Most teams start with good intentions: a welcome sequence, a few lead nurture drips, maybe a re-engagement email or two.
But then the product team adds webinar invites…
The sales team wants a win-back sequence…
CS wants to cross-sell paid customers…
And now you’ve got 17 workflows, half with outdated logic, and no clear sense of priority. Some leads are getting 6 emails a week. Others? Nothing for months.
The solution isn’t to delete everything—it’s to build a narrative map.
Build One Clear Narrative per Lifecycle Stage
I organize email strategy by lifecycle—not just list segments.
Here’s a typical framework I use inside HubSpot:
- Subscribers → Focus on building trust and curiosity (content, story, early CTA)
- Leads → Start qualifying intent (guides, webinars, soft asks)
- MQLs → Engage with specific product/service hooks (ROI, use cases, light CTAs)
- SQLs → Drive urgency and sales alignment (case studies, offer reminders)
- Customers → Onboarding and adoption (value delivery, feature education)
- Evangelists → Ask for reviews, referrals, and community participation
Each stage gets its own nurture “storyline,” and critically: each contact can only be in one nurture track at a time.
No conflicting asks. No content whiplash.
Hygiene: Keeping the CRM Clean Enough to Trust
A nurture strategy is only as good as your data hygiene.
Too often I see this:
- Contacts with missing lifecycle stages
- Duplicates showing up across sales territories
- Old leads marked as “open deal” from a rep who left 9 months ago
- Disqualified leads still receiving high-intent product offers
So I bake in automated sanity checks:
- Workflow to auto-clear stale deals after 60 days of no activity
- Lifecycle resets when a lead fills out a fresh intent signal (like pricing page visit)
- Monthly health report: “Contacts with empty lifecycle,” “Unowned MQLs,” “Deals with no recent activity”
Think of this as oil changes for your CRM. Nobody likes doing them. But skip it for six months? Now you’re in trouble.
Real-World Win: From Dead List to $78K in Pipeline
One client had a massive “dead leads” list. Over 30,000 contacts they hadn’t emailed in 9+ months. No sequences. No segmentation. Just gathering dust.
We ran a three-step resurrection play:
- List scrub: Removed hard bounces, role accounts, duplicates
- “Still interested?” reactivation campaign with soft CTA
- If clicked → moved into a new 7-part nurture with personalized messaging based on original funnel source
Result:
Open rate: 34%
Re-engaged leads: 1,284
Deals created: 49
Pipeline: $78,000
Closed within 60 days: $21,000
All from “dead” leads. They weren’t dead. Just neglected.
The Right Time to Scale Spend—and What to Do First
Scaling ad spend is the part everyone gets excited about.
It’s also where most teams light their budgets on fire.
I’ve seen it too many times: someone cracks a decent CAC on $500/day, and next thing you know, the budget jumps to $5K/day overnight. Performance tanks. Panic sets in. Blame gets tossed between ad creative, landing pages, and “maybe the algorithm is broken.”
But the truth is simpler:
You didn’t scale the system. You just scaled the spend.
You Don’t Scale Spend. You Scale Infrastructure.
The biggest myth in performance marketing is that scaling spend is a media buyer’s job.
It’s not. Scaling profitably is a cross-functional operation.
Here’s what I look for before increasing budget on any channel:
- Unit economics are solid. CAC to LTV ratio is healthy and repeatable.
- Funnel speed is stable. Leads move through the pipeline without clogging (especially in longer B2B cycles).
- Creative fatigue is under control. I have 2–3 rounds of fresh creatives ready before scale starts.
- Conversion surfaces are dialed. The LP isn’t leaking. The form works. The offer converts.
- Sales can handle the volume. No point flooding the funnel if reps are already overwhelmed.
Scaling spend before this is like putting a turbocharger on a car with a flat tire.
The First 3 Things I Fix Before Scaling
From experience, these are the levers I check (and often fix) before pushing budget:
- Cost per Lead → Cost per Opportunity
A cheap lead that never converts is expensive. Before scaling, I double-check we’re optimizing for opportunity, not vanity metrics. This means syncing actual pipeline data from the CRM, not just relying on Google or Meta-reported CPLs. - Landing Page Load Speed
Silly as it sounds, I’ve seen page speed alone increase CVR by 20–30%. Especially on mobile. Scaling without a fast experience is just paying more to lose people faster. - Creative/Offer Redundancy
If we’re running five versions of the same message in different colors, we’re not ready. I build a creative matrix with multiple angles—problem/solution, emotional, social proof, contrarian—so we can rotate offers, not just images.
When Scale Works: An Example from a Product Launch
At Dream Media, we had a CPG client launching a DTC skincare line. Small budget at first—$300/day across Meta and TikTok.
We found early traction with a contrarian angle: “Don’t Moisturize Until You Do This One Thing.” LP conversions hit 5%, AOV was $52, CAC around $19. It looked promising.
But instead of cranking budget right away, we paused scaling and:
- Re-shot winning creative in 3 new variants
- Built a 3-step upsell flow to increase AOV
- Set up post-purchase review capture and email sequence
- Stress-tested fulfillment and support
Once all of that was live, we scaled gradually to $3K/day over 6 weeks.
Result? CAC held steady, and ROAS improved slightly as the algorithm had room to optimize. In month 2, they hit $118K in revenue—double their initial forecast.
Scaling Is About Repeatability, Not Risk
If you’re guessing or hoping the funnel will hold up—you’re not ready to scale.
But when everything’s buttoned up, and you’ve tested what matters (offer, creative, funnel velocity, conversion path), scale becomes a math problem.
More inputs → more outputs.
And the beauty? It gets easier to diagnose performance issues once you’re scaled—because there’s enough data to see what’s actually breaking.
When to Pause and Recalibrate (Even if Things Look “Fine”)
Here’s a hard truth:
Sometimes the smartest growth move is to hit pause.
Not because performance is terrible. But because it’s just good enough—and that can be even more dangerous.
We’ve all been there. CAC is holding steady. ROAS is decent. Churn’s not terrible. Team’s not panicking. On paper, things are “fine.”
But here’s the catch:
Fine can be the enemy of breakthrough.
Good Enough Can Hide Bigger Problems
I’ve learned to trust my gut when something feels off in the data, even if metrics aren’t throwing alarms.
Some warning signs I watch for:
- Plateauing new user growth, even if CAC is flat
- Drop in organic brand search volume
- Engagement decay on ads, despite stable CTRs
- Sales team feedback that lead quality is quietly slipping
- A/B test fatigue—when nothing wins big, just small marginal lifts
These signals don’t scream “stop!”—but they whisper “this isn’t sustainable.”
A Real-World Example: The Quiet Plateau
One campaign that sticks with me was a high-volume funnel for a health product. CAC was solid around $34. AOV was $97. Everything “worked.”
But then, over 6 weeks, conversion rate slowly ticked down.
Not dramatically—just 0.1% per week.
It would’ve been easy to write off. Normal variation, right?
Instead, we paused all scale tests and went under the hood. Found two issues:
- Creative fatigue—our top video had been running for 90 days and was no longer thumb-stopping.
- Shipping delay complaints—CS volume had spiked, hurting post-purchase experience and long-term retention.
We wouldn’t have caught either if we were only watching CAC and ROAS.
After fixing both (new ads, better delivery estimates), performance not only recovered—it improved. CVR rebounded, repeat purchase rate jumped 18%, and LTV went up by month three.
Recalibration Isn’t Losing. It’s Leadership.
In team meetings, I always remind people:
Pausing to reassess is a strength, not a stall.
Especially if you’re leading a team or managing budget at scale, the cost of pushing through friction adds up fast. And worse: it builds a culture of “more budget = more growth,” which rarely holds long-term.
Instead, I’ve built systems where:
- Monthly growth reviews force us to question assumptions
- Ops and CX data get equal weight as performance metrics
- Anyone on the team can flag a “slow bleed” risk
- No one gets punished for calling a timeout if something feels off
This is where real growth leaders separate themselves from ad jockeys.
The Power of a Strategic Pause
In one B2B SaaS client case, we actually paused all paid spend for a quarter.
Sound extreme? It was. But we did it after realizing 80% of closed-won deals came from content + referral—not paid search or social. We were spending to look like we were growing.
In that 90-day pause, we rebuilt the funnel, automated our outreach, re-segmented the list, launched an inbound content engine, and aligned sales with lifecycle email. When we reactivated paid, CAC dropped 42%.
And we grew faster.
Sometimes stopping is the smartest way to start again—this time with clarity, purpose, and force multipliers in place.
The Role of AI and Automation in Reducing CAC—Without Losing the Human Touch
AI is having a moment—but not always a helpful one.
You’ve probably seen the extremes: marketers auto-spamming cold leads with ChatGPT-generated junk, or teams paralyzed by overthinking AI strategy like it’s 2045.
I’ve seen both sides. And here’s the truth from the field:
AI can absolutely help reduce CAC—but only if it supports, not replaces, your core strategy.
Let me break down how I’ve used it in practice.
Using AI to Optimize the Right Parts of the Funnel
AI doesn’t magically fix a weak offer or a bad UX. But it does shine in areas where scale and speed matter most.
Here’s where it’s delivered the most CAC impact for me:
- Ad Creative Testing at Speed
Using AI to generate dozens of headline variations based on top-performing themes. We feed them into Meta split tests, kill losers fast, and feed winners back into human creative sessions for polish. - Landing Page Personalization
Not creepy personalization. Smart segmentation. For one campaign, we used AI to segment traffic behavior into 3 personas based on session data. Each got a different CTA and hero copy—CRO jumped 24%. - Predictive Lead Scoring
Especially in higher-ticket B2B, AI models helped us identify which inbound leads were likely to convert. We routed them to reps faster, shortened the sales cycle, and saved paid media from chasing unqualified MQLs. - Automated Feedback Loops
We used AI to pull insights from live chat transcripts and customer support tickets, then mapped them to stages of the funnel. It helped us reduce refund requests and revise ad messaging that was overpromising.
The Mistake Most Teams Make with AI
Here’s the trap:
Over-automating without oversight.
In one ecom account, a team let an AI-driven bidding strategy run on Google Ads with zero human review. On the surface, CAC was decent. But 60% of conversions were from coupon chasers who never reordered.
LTV cratered. No one noticed for weeks.
AI’s not a growth plan. It’s an acceleration tool.
If you don’t steer it, it’ll optimize for the wrong things.
That’s why I always build a “human guardrail” system:
- Weekly audits of AI-generated copy or recommendations
- Manual review of customer intent on AI-qualified leads
- Human-crafted “north star” messaging and brand tone docs the AI must follow
- Controlled A/B tests that isolate AI impact without rolling it out blindly
The best use of AI is invisible to your customers—but powerful under the hood.
What I’ve Found That Works Best
When used right, AI reduces CAC not by “replacing people,” but by freeing your team to focus on what matters—the stuff machines can’t do well yet:
- Insightful creative ideas
- Cross-channel strategy
- Emotional copywriting
- Brand cohesion
- Real relationship building
In one of my favorite wins, we used AI to handle 80% of a retargeting campaign’s creative testing—but the final ad copy that crushed? It was written by a human who understood the emotional reason people weren’t checking out: anxiety about commitment.
That nuance doesn’t show up in the data—until a human spots it.
So yes, I’m bullish on AI. But I always pair it with the messy, emotional, people-first thinking that actually lowers CAC long-term.
The Real ROI of Building vs. Buying Growth
This question comes up in every marketing strategy meeting I’ve ever been in:
“Should we build this in-house… or just buy a tool / hire an agency / bring in a freelancer?”
It seems like a tactical question.
It’s not. It’s a strategic lever—one that has a direct impact on CAC, velocity, and scalability.
Let me explain how I approach it, and what’s worked in practice.
The Build Mindset: When to Own It
Building in-house works best when the thing you’re building is:
- A core differentiator (e.g., unique positioning, funnel, creative style)
- Something you’ll need to do repeatedly and at scale
- Close to the customer (e.g., brand messaging, product marketing, LTV optimization)
For example:
In a past role, we built an internal creative pod dedicated solely to testing new hooks and messaging angles. Sure, we could’ve outsourced that. But creative testing was central to how we lowered CAC by 40%. The insights we got from running 100+ creative tests internally fed the rest of our strategy—from landing page copy to email flows to upsells.
Owning it gave us speed, continuity, and deep audience understanding that no vendor could match.
Yes, it was a heavier lift up front. But over time?
It compounded. Our internal cost per test dropped, velocity increased, and we had way more control over narrative.
The Buy Mindset: When to Outsource
Now—there’s zero ego in smart outsourcing.
Buying speed or expertise is often the fastest path to results if:
- You need results fast and don’t have time to hire or train
- The area isn’t a core part of your customer experience
- There’s a proven partner or solution that can execute better than you internally
Example:
In one ecom project, we needed to spin up international paid search fast. We didn’t speak five languages and didn’t want to risk translation errors. So we hired a multilingual PPC agency that already had playbooks ready. CAC was higher than our core market—but still profitable. And we went from 0 to 6-figures in monthly international revenue in under 90 days.
Buying gave us reach.
We also use “buy” strategies for tooling—automating attribution, reporting, email deliverability, and other ops-heavy areas that don’t directly influence brand perception but can quietly kill CAC if they break.
My Rule of Thumb
I’ve boiled it down to this over the years:
- Build what creates your edge.
That’s your brand voice, offer strategy, creative muscle, customer journey—things your team should deeply own and evolve. - Buy what supports the engine.
That includes specialized execution, platforms, technical services, or areas where others can outperform you cost-effectively.
There’s no badge of honor in building everything. And no shame in buying smart.
The real ROI comes from clarity: knowing what kind of growth machine you’re trying to build and aligning your resources accordingly.
Rebuilding Trust with Sales, Product, and Leadership
Here’s the quiet truth behind many marketing struggles:
CAC is often high not because ads suck—but because trust is broken inside the company.
Marketing doesn’t trust sales to close.
Sales doesn’t trust marketing’s leads.
Product doesn’t trust either one to represent the user correctly.
Leadership doesn’t know who to believe.
I’ve walked into these dynamics before.
And I’ve led teams out of them.
Here’s what it takes.
The Sales-Marketing Feedback Loop Is Everything
In one company I joined, the sales team had stopped looking at leads from paid social altogether. Why? Because six months earlier, marketing dumped a bunch of top-of-funnel ebook downloads into HubSpot and called them “leads.”
No segmentation. No intent signal. No context.
So by the time I came in, CAC from paid channels looked awful—because nothing was converting past the form fill.
We turned it around by doing something radical:
We sat down and listened.
We created a joint Slack channel between the media buyers and the closers. Every week, we looked at:
- Which leads actually booked calls
- Which ones showed real buying signals
- Which ad copy was setting expectations clearly
We started optimizing not just for CPL—but for sales velocity. Within 60 days, CAC dropped by 25%, not from changing the media plan, but from changing how we listened to sales.
Rebuilding with Product Means Getting Out of the Funnel
This one’s personal.
At one startup, product and marketing were barely speaking. The product team saw us as “demand generators,” not contributors to product direction. Meanwhile, we felt boxed out of real user insights.
So I proposed a shared project: a churn audit.
We pulled every canceled user’s post-survey comment. Marketing looked at the emotional language. Product looked at feature complaints. Then we matched cancellation reasons to acquisition channels.
What we found: customers acquired via comparison landing pages were twice as likely to churn in 90 days.
That insight led product to ship onboarding changes. And it led us to rethink how we positioned those comparison ads.
Churn dropped. CAC stayed flat. LTV went up.
And more importantly, trust started to rebuild. Because now we were solving problems together, not blaming each other.
Executive Alignment Isn’t a Meeting—It’s a Narrative
Leadership doesn’t want more dashboards.
They want a story they can trust—one that aligns marketing activities with company-level outcomes.
The turning point for me came when I stopped trying to prove marketing’s value in isolation. Instead, I started framing our updates like this:
“This is the part of the business we’re focused on fixing.
Here’s what we’ve tested. Here’s what’s working.
Here’s where we need help or alignment.”
One CEO told me later: “That’s the first time I felt like marketing was operating with the business instead of next to it.”
Trust isn’t about getting buy-in for campaigns.
It’s about co-owning the mission.
The “Invisible Work” That Actually Moves the Needle
The biggest wins we had didn’t always come from “big swings.”
No viral campaign. No celebrity influencer. No wild media hack.
They came from the stuff that never gets a headline—but radically shifts how the machine performs.
Fixing Tagging and UTM Chaos
One client had five media buyers across Google, Facebook, TikTok, and native—each using their own naming conventions and UTM structures.
The result?
- 30% of conversions were showing up as “unattributed” in GA4
- Email sequences were firing for the wrong journeys
- We were pausing ads that were actually working, just misattributed
So I made it a priority to clean up every tag, pixel, and naming convention.
It took three weeks of unglamorous work—writing UTM templates, syncing with the email team, creating dashboards that actually made sense.
But it let us finally see what was happening. Within one month, we recovered over $40k in spend that had been written off.
Writing the Copy That Doesn’t Scale (But Unlocks Everything)
Sometimes, I’d write landing page copy myself—just to prove the hook before briefing the content team.
At one point, we had a product that was great—but nobody could explain it simply. Sales would ramble. Ads would confuse. CTRs tanked.
So I wrote a one-liner I’d tested in email subject lines:
“Like melatonin—but with a brain scan.”
It wasn’t polished. It didn’t test well with internal stakeholders.
But it doubled click-through on cold ads.
Then sales started opening with it.
Then product used it in onboarding.
That copy never made the brand book. But it changed the conversion curve.
Not because it was clever—because it was clear.
Slowing Down Just Enough to Speed Up
Here’s the paradox:
When CAC is too high, most teams move faster. More ad variations. More channels. More urgency.
What often works better?
Slow down. Watch. Listen.
In one case, we paused all new creative for two weeks. We just watched session recordings. Listened to call transcripts. Asked buyers questions in chat.
From that, we found:
- 50% of cart abandonments were happening at the billing step, not pricing objections
- Users weren’t sure if their data was encrypted
- One CTA button on mobile had a CSS glitch making it hard to tap
We fixed those things. No new spend. No new channels.
CAC dropped by 18%.
Speed matters. But reflection is often the missing multiplier.
Final Results: What Changed, What Didn’t, and What I’d Do Again
We started this story trying to reduce CAC by 40% without cutting ad spend.
We didn’t cut the budget.
We didn’t change the product.
We didn’t get a new tech stack.
But we did get that 40% drop.
Here’s what that looked like across the board:
- CAC dropped by 42.3% over 4 months
- Conversion rate from click to sale went from 1.7% to 3.2%
- LTV rose by 18% (from $212 to $250) mostly due to better onboarding and remarketing
- Blended ROAS improved by 68%, thanks to higher first-purchase AOV and more accurate attribution
- Velocity increased—we saw shorter time-to-purchase and faster scaling windows
What Didn’t Change (Much)
We didn’t magically turn every channel into a goldmine.
Some campaigns still underperformed.
Some tests flopped.
Some optimizations had almost zero impact.
But now we knew why.
And that clarity let us move faster and smarter going forward.
We didn’t grow just because CAC dropped.
CAC dropped because we understood more of the system—and made the hard, simple changes.
What I’d Absolutely Do Again
- Treat the post-click journey like a product. We treated onboarding, landing pages, and nurture flows with the same rigor as paid ads. That alignment is where the margin lives.
- Clean up data early. Attribution chaos hides your best (and worst) decisions.
- Write for the confused, not the converted. Most conversion issues are clarity issues.
- Listen before scaling. Interviews, recordings, surveys—they surface the insights you can’t see in a dashboard.
What I’d Avoid or Reframe
- Don’t scale what isn’t ready. A few times we scaled an offer or funnel before it was really tight. That wasted spend and buried good data under noise.
- Be cautious with new channels. Not because they’re bad—but because they come with learning curves, pixel ramp-up time, and operational complexity. Nail your core first.
- Avoid copy by committee. Every time we diluted a message to make it more palatable, performance dropped.
The Real Win
The biggest win wasn’t the CAC number.
It was the shift in how the team thought and operated.
We stopped chasing tactics and started thinking in systems.
We replaced panic with patience.
We created a repeatable model we could adapt and run again and again.
And that’s the real growth lever:
Build a team that knows how to solve the problem, not just chase a number.
If I Were Starting This Again, or Scaling to 10x
If I could go back to the start—or had to do this with 10x the budget—here’s what I’d keep front and center.
1. Don’t Wait to Fix Attribution
The bigger you scale, the more expensive bad data becomes. Set rules early: clean UTM structure, source-of-truth dashboards, and a shared definition of success across the team. Attribution drama slows momentum more than ad fatigue ever will.
2. Landing Pages > Ads
If you only have time to fix one thing, fix what happens after the click. We learned this the hard way. We’d pause “underperforming” ad sets only to find the traffic was good—it was the page or follow-up that dropped the ball.
3. More Offers, Not Just More Ads
When we unlocked CAC gains, it almost always came from fresh angles: new bundles, new guarantees, new messaging frameworks. One of our biggest wins came from testing a “solution-first” hook instead of leading with the product.
4. Your Funnel Is a Flywheel
Every campaign is part of a system. Think onboarding, retargeting, email, upsells, reviews, loyalty—all of it influences CAC and LTV. Don’t chase channel-specific ROAS at the expense of full-funnel health.
5. Train Your Team to Think Like Owners
This is the one I’d tattoo on the wall. If the whole team is focused on metrics they own—but don’t understand how they connect to CAC, margin, and scale—you’ll hit ceilings fast. Cross-training changed everything for us. Growth became a team sport, not just a performance team metric.
6. Test in Sprints, Not Chaos
We adopted a “2-week sprint, 1-week analysis” cadence mid-way through this journey. Test fewer things, but test them harder. We got better lift from 5 thoughtful tests than 50 random ones. Especially at scale, you need structure to move fast.
7. Emotional Buy-In Wins
When stakeholders saw the real numbers and customer voice together, we got budget, buy-in, and space to test. CAC dropped not just because of good media buying—but because the whole org started caring about why people bought.
Final Word
If you’re stuck with rising CAC and flatlining growth, the answer probably isn’t a new agency, new platform, or new hack.
It’s usually this:
Fix the gaps in the middle.
The space between interest and intent.
Between click and commitment.
Between noise and real clarity.
We didn’t reduce CAC by spending less.
We reduced it by making every dollar smarter.
That’s the real story.
Marketing Unplugged 
Leave a Reply